Long WeekendDestinations
Destinations
5 photos

Hotel Residenza in Farnese

4-star hotel · Municipio I, Rome

Long Weekend score

Weak

1 serious report in 102 reviews: a physical hazard

Guests rate nearly every hotel highly: half the hotels in Rome are rated 9.0 out of 10 or more. So our score shows how a hotel compares with the rest, not how luxurious it is.

  • Rated higher than 20% of Rome hotels
  • 79% of guest comments are praise
  • 63% of guest photos show no damage
How this score is made
  • Rated higher than 20% of Rome hotels. Compared with 7,758 hotels in Rome. Counts for 50% of the score.
  • 79% of guest comments are praise. 255 praise, 67 complain. Counts for 30% of the score.
  • 63% of guest photos show no damage. 38 of 60 photos. Counts for 20% of the score.
  • Serious reports are never counted in. They are flagged beside the score, because one matters even when everything else is good.
  • $201 a nighttypical for two, before tax · from $134
  • 13 min walkto the Pantheon
  • 102 guest reviewsfrom the last 2 years
  • 60 guest photostheirs, not the hotel's
Hotel Residenza in Farnese$201 a typical night
Book now

At a glance

For

  • 13 min walk to the Pantheon991 m by road
  • Location75 praise · 0 complain
  • Staff56 praise · 7 complain
  • Breakfast40 praise · 6 complain
  • Quiet at night26 praise · 4 complain

Against

  • Guest photos show wear and dirt22 of the 60 photos guests took, and 0 of the hotel's 40
  • Room condition21 complain · 0 praise
  • Value11 complain · 6 praise
  • Problems in the bathroomcomplaints falling: 12.2 in 100 a year ago, 5.7 now9 of 102 guests
  • Complaints the hotel left unresolvedcomplaints rising: 2.0 in 100 a year ago, 11.3 now7 of 102 guests

What guests reported

What guests say

102 reviews from the last 2 years. Most praised: location (75 guests). Weakest: room condition, where 21 of the 21 who mention it complain.

Location750Strength

The location is also great, it was easy to get to all the attractions.

Google, February 2026, rated 5/5 by this guest

Great location, we walked every day to another attraction.

Google, December 2025, rated 5/5 by this guest
Staffcomplaints rising: 0.0 in 100 a year ago, 13.2 now567Strength

The staff are very friendly and helpful, including the breakfast waiters who are super friendly.

Google, October 2025, rated 5/5 by this guest

The location was great, the staff was friendly, and the hotel was very beautiful.

Google, March 2026, rated 5/5 by this guest

Bad adventure happened we do not know yet because of who the hotel says about booking booking says about the hotel is the fact that the staff after calling it turned out to be really rude.

Tripadvisor, May 2026, rated 1/5 by this guest
Breakfast406Strength

Very friendly staff and very helpful with our big group.

Google, October 2025, rated 5/5 by this guest

From the moment we arrived, we felt very welcome: the staff is lovely and always willing to help, the cleanliness is impeccable, and the breakfast service is excellent.

Google, December 2025, rated 5/5 by this guest

it's not a 4-star hotel, the rooms are very unpleasant, there's only air conditioning in the summer (in Rome!!!), the facilities are old and mediocre, and the breakfast is very poor.

Google, April 2025, rated 1/5 by this guest
Quiet at night264Strength

Although we stayed only one night we greatly enjoyed the central location and at the same time secluded just enough to ensure a peaceful sleep.

Tripadvisor, January 2026, rated 5/5 by this guest

Wonderful place, not only for being in the center and close to all the monuments, but also for the tranquility, the friendliness of the breakfast staff and receptionists, and the superb breakfast.

Google, January 2026, rated 5/5 by this guest

Next to our room was the storage room for cleaning supplies, so our peace and quiet was over by 6:00 a.m.

Google, August 2026, rated 3/5 by this guest
Cleanliness326Mostly good

Very kind staff, dated structure but clean.

Tripadvisor, April 2026, rated 4/5 by this guest

Very kind staff, dated structure but clean.

Tripadvisor, April 2026, rated 4/5 by this guest

and little more, not height of the 4 stars for sure, the rooms are rather dated and not as clean as they should, breakfast is definitely the best dish, although a little more attention would not hurt, I write this because the asking price is from 4 stssse superior and here we are on 3..

Tripadvisor, January 2025, rated 3/5 by this guest
Beds73Mostly good

Nice breakfast, very helpful staff, good room with comfortable bed and shower.

Google, December 2025, rated 5/5 by this guest

Great location, friendly staff, good beakfast, reasonable rooms, storage space limited though, good beds, good breakfast.

Tripadvisor, January 2026, rated 3/5 by this guest

The service was good and friendly, but the electrical outlets in the rooms weren't very good, and the bed wasn't very comfortable.

Google, May 2025, rated 4/5 by this guest
Room size139Split

Rooms a bit small, but comfortable enough.

Google, July 2025, rated 4/5 by this guest

The rooms are very small, just good for sleeping.

Google, August 2025, rated 3/5 by this guest

The rooms are small by North American standards, but pretty typical for European locations.

Tripadvisor, September 2025, rated 4/5 by this guest
Value611Weak spot

EXPENSIVE, NAILED (I've attached a photo of the bathroom window, DEPRESSING).

Google, June 2025, rated 2/5 by this guest

The overall value it isn't anyway 4 stars but 3 especially because of the general environment of the hotel.

Google, August 2025, rated 3/5 by this guest

It should be cheaper for what it offers, but you buy the short distance to the Ancient Rome

Tripadvisor, May 2025, rated 4/5 by this guest
Room condition021Weak spot

The room was adequate, but it could use some updating.

Google, June 2026, rated 4/5 by this guest

However, the experience is partially overshadowed by two areas of improvement that are not up to a 4-star rating: breakfast, which needs a decisive upgrade in quality and variety, and the general care of the hotel, which shows signs of wear and requires more attention in maintenance.

Tripadvisor, December 2025, rated 4/5 by this guest

I greatly value the balance between practicality and personalized service, and this hotel more than delivers, although it could use some modernization.

Google, July 2026, rated 5/5 by this guest

Too few mentions to judge: views and food.

Who stays, and their score out of 10

Couples7.622 reviews
Families7.920 reviews

From every review of the last two years that gives a score and says who travelled, including those with no words.

All 464 Google ratings

5 stars49%
4 stars29%
3 stars11%
2 stars4%
1 star7%

Problems guests raised

Raised most: problems in the bathroom, in 9 of 102 reviews.

Problems in the bathroomcomplaints falling: 12.2 in 100 a year ago, 5.7 now9 of 1021 in 11 reviews

Furthermore, in the morning there was no hot water in the shower, only lukewarm water, barely enough for two quick showers.

Google, November 2025, rated 3/5 by this guest

The rooms were very neglected, the bathroom door didn't close properly, the bathroom stank, the breakfast was very poor (hard bread), the walls were like paper, I was with my son, we were talking quietly and the receptionist called us saying we were too loud, the location is great, it's close.

Google, January 2025, rated 2/5 by this guest
Complaints the hotel left unresolvedcomplaints rising: 2.0 in 100 a year ago, 11.3 now7 of 1021 in 15 reviews

Some doubts about the administrative competence of the front desk, as they asked for a copy of the credit card used for the reservation: too bad it was a virtual card, but even explaining this didn't help.

Google, September 2026, rated 2/5 by this guest

You told me it works, but they don't call.

Tripadvisor, May 2026, rated 1/5 by this guest
Not as shown or booked5 of 1021 in 20 reviews

The beds were right next to the front door, the reality was very different from the photo on the site.

Tripadvisor, January 2026, rated 2/5 by this guest
Unexpected charges and refunds5 of 1021 in 20 reviews

We also paid 844 euro for 3 nights well above the rate published on trip advisor.

Tripadvisor, October 2025, rated 2/5 by this guest

They now refuse to honor their agreement of refund, claiming I was sent the money already.

Google, January 2026, rated 1/5 by this guest
Heating and air conditioning5 of 1021 in 20 reviews

The room was completely outdated and neglected: no lamps on the bedside tables, hardly any electrical outlets, and to top it all off, the air conditioning didn't work.

Google, April 2025, rated 1/5 by this guest
Mould or damp3 of 1021 in 34 reviews

In our room, there was a wardrobe that smelled strongly of damp when opened, which was extremely unpleasant.

Google, December 2025, rated 3/5 by this guest

Serious reports

1 in 102 reviews, most common first. Shown beside the score, never averaged into it.

A physical hazard1 of 102 reviews

Between the dirty walls, the ill-fitting toilet seat, the shower door that wouldn't close, the lack of ventilation, the corroded bidet drain, the broken air conditioning, the smoke detector taped shut to prevent it from beeping, and the holes in the walls...

Google, March 2026, rated 2/5 by this guest
Someone fell illNone found
Bed bugs or bitesNone found
Something stolenNone found
Harassment or discriminationNone found

These are guests' own accounts from their reviews. We have not verified them, and the hotel may dispute them. A report is counted only when the guest says it happened at the hotel and holds the hotel responsible.

Photos, checked

22 of the 60 guest photos we checked show damage or dirt (37%).

Guest photos showing damage or dirt22 of 6037%

Of 60 guest photos, 22 show damage or dirt: peeling paint or cracks in 8, stains in 6, rust or limescale in 5 and building work in 4, and some photos show more than one. Of the hotel's own 40, 0 do.

What it advertises, against the photos

Barin 1 of the hotel’s photos · 3 of guests’In photos, not advertised
Private balconyin 3 of the hotel’s photos · 5 of guests’In photos, not advertised
Water viewin 0 of the hotel’s photos · 3 of guests’In photos, not advertised

Guests’ photos confirm: restaurant (3).

The hotel says it has no swimming pool, spa, gym or hot tub.

Price, place and rooms

Price

$201 is a typical night, from 297 dates checked in the coming year.

$201Typical night
$134Cheapest night
$420Dearest night

Weekends cost 13% more than weekdays

A typical night, month by month

Cheapest month: Jan 2027, $151Dearest month: Sep 2027, $324

Lowest advertised nightly rate for two adults; taxes and local fees are not included. Shown in US dollars.

Nearby

The Pantheon is 991 m away by road, about 13 minutes on foot. There are 3 bars or clubs within 200 metres.

  1. Nearest main road: Lungotevere dei Tebaldi76 m
  2. Nearest shop: GustArte2 min walk125 m by road
  3. The Pantheon13 min walk991 m by road
  4. The Trevi Fountain21 min walk1.6 km by road
  5. St. Peter's Basilica28 min walk2.1 km by road
  6. The Colosseum29 min walk2.1 km by road

The lines are 5, 10 and 15 minutes on foot.

Bars and clubs right outside, within 200 m3
Places to eat within a 5 minute walk241

Distances follow the streets, not straight lines.

Rooms

4 room types, from 10 to 23 m².

  • Single Room10 m²Sleeps 1
  • Twin Room16 m²Sleeps 2
  • Double Room16 m²Sleeps 2
  • Triple Room23 m²Sleeps 31 Double bed + 1 Twin bed

From the hotel's own room descriptions, checked against each room's photos.

How it compares

How it ranks

Guests who booked rate it 8.4 out of 10. Only 20% of the 7,758 hotels in Rome are rated lower, and a typical one is rated 9.0.

Every review site, out of 100

Google824.1 of 5 · 464 reviews
Tripadvisor824.1 of 5 · 1,059 reviews
Booking sites, guests who stayed848.4 of 10 · 103 reviews

If room condition matters to you

Here, 21 of the 21 guests who mention room condition complain. These nearby hotels do better on it.

Hotel DamasoMunicipio I · scored 97 out of 100 · $353 a night170StrengthPalazzo NainerMunicipio I · scored 91 out of 100 · $398 a night263StrengthHotel AbruzziMunicipio I · scored 90 out of 100 · $298 a night212Strength

More hotels in Rome

The nearest first, with our score for each.

Martis Palace Hotel RomeMunicipio I · $424 a typical night98 · StrongHotel DamasoMunicipio I · $353 a typical night97 · StrongHotel LunettaMunicipio I · $355 a typical night84 · StrongResidenza SpadaMunicipio I · $247 a typical night69 · GoodHotel Ponte SistoMunicipio I · $270 a typical night68 · Good

All hotels in Rome

How we know

102 reviews counted · 100 photos checked · updated 11 October 2026
  • We collected this hotel's 401 most recent reviews from Google, Tripadvisor and the Booking network. 102 of them describe a stay in the last 2 years and are the ones counted here; the rest were 224 older, 10 in other languages and 65 with a score but no words.
  • The hotel replied to 0 of its 200 newest Google reviews.
  • 2 in every 100 reviews thank a staff member by name.
  • 2 reviews mention a free upgrade, a cake or a gift.
  • We looked at 100 photos: the first 40 of the hotel's own and the 60 newest from guests.
  • Every number on this page is counted, not estimated. Anything in quotation marks is a guest's own words.
Hotel Residenza in Farnese1 of 5
A rooftop terrace with metal tables and chairs and gold vases with white flowers, beside an ornate historic building with arched windows and rooftops visible beyond.
A rooftop terrace with metal tables and chairs and gold vases with white flowers, beside an ornate historic building with arched windows and rooftops visible beyond.
A rooftop terrace with several tables set with blue cloths and yellow chair covers, potted plants, and a view over rooftops and a white church.
A rooftop terrace with several tables set with blue cloths and yellow chair covers, potted plants, and a view over rooftops and a white church.
A twin bedroom with two single beds with grey covers, a wall mirror, a writing desk with a chair, a chandelier and a framed painting on floral wallpaper.
A twin bedroom with two single beds with grey covers, a wall mirror, a writing desk with a chair, a chandelier and a framed painting on floral wallpaper.
A bedroom with an orange quilted bed, patterned cushions, a lit wall lamp, a framed print and a painted rose mural on the wall.
A bedroom with an orange quilted bed, patterned cushions, a lit wall lamp, a framed print and a painted rose mural on the wall.
A hotel lounge with green upholstered sofas and an armchair, a checkered floor, a patterned rug, and a large pink floral painting on the wall.
A hotel lounge with green upholstered sofas and an armchair, a checkered floor, a patterned rug, and a large pink floral painting on the wall.

Book Hotel Residenza in Farnese

×

We do not sell rooms. Each of these opens the hotel on a booking site, and we may earn a commission. It never changes what this page says.